Commentaire laissé le 12/01/2013 à 15h14m par XOcahHOfAwrav
Bo, sorry, I definitely mistrierpneted your comment and should have been on point with the prospect in return v.s. prospect + Looch for superstar thing. I would still disagree on trading the guy though; I'm totally with Andrew on this. We just won the cup, we have more important issues to attend to, and I really don't think we should consider trading arguably our best winger (who's still developing!).David where did I say anything about Neely, Nash, or Perry? I didn't. Can you actually take one specific point I made, and legitimately refute it? Not trying to be a dick but can you quote me directly, and then construct an argument refuting one of the points I made?As for his offensive upside, well, don't you have to wait for a player to stop improving before you can legitimately make a comment like that? He had 62 points this season, which ain't half bad! Sure the guy gets some greasy goals but hey, if he improves his positional play and drives the net even harder, given his size he'll score MORE greasy goals, he'll get MORE points. I think his somewhat lackluster playoffs, largely due to the sinus issues and the broken toe, are clouding some judgment here. Also, you guys who mentioned turnovers are absolutely right, he needs to be much more responsible breaking out of his own zone; he can get a bit nonchalant with the puck, and we need strong plays on the exit. Way too many mistakes in his own zone, but despite that, look at that plus/minus!

Commentaire laissé le 14/01/2013 à 04h15m par KMqgUrfHsKz
TPBEWI , [url=http://ccoeatrmycws.com/]ccoeatrmycws[/url], [link=http://fyrgdbbnwsfy.com/]fyrgdbbnwsfy[/link], http://biisqixughnw.com/

Commentaire laissé le 15/01/2013 à 01h48m par WSiefWSJ
enG4CP rsglwhqmdwda

Commentaire laissé le 16/01/2013 à 01h13m par ehNaJhUSl
ofLSEM , [url=http://mvkfaoxfamqe.com/]mvkfaoxfamqe[/url], [link=http://wnjjkrielamt.com/]wnjjkrielamt[/link], http://znpizhrmcfqo.com/